>Suzanne Conklin Akbari, Theories of vision and the development of late medieval allegory, New York, 1995
>LY BAIRD-LANGE et H SCHNUTTGEN, A Bibliography ofChaucer, 1974-1985, 1988
>STEVEN BOTTERILL, Re-reading Lancelot. Dante, Chaucer, and Le Chevalier de la Charrette, Philological Quarterly, 67, 1988 : p. 279-289
>THOMAS P CAMPBELL, Machaut and Chaucer. «Ars nova» and the art of narrative, The Chaucer Review, 24, 1989/90 : p. 275-289
>LAWRENCE M CLOPPER, The Form of Romance and the Resolution of Theological Issues, Medievalia et Humanistica, 15, 1987 : p. 119-146
>ROBERT M CORREALE, Chaucer's The Friars Tale, Line 1511-12, and Les Cronicles of Nicholas Trevet, Notes and Queries, 35, 1988 : p. 296-298
>GEORGIAR CRAMPTON, Chaucer's singular prayer, Medium Aevum, 59, 1990 : p. 191-213
>Susan Crane, Froissart's Dit dou Bleu Chevalier as a source for Chaucer's Book of the Duchess, Medium Aevum, LXI, 1992 : p. 59-74
>André Crépin, La fortune de l'histoire de Grisélidis - réflexions sur The Clerk's Tale de Chaucer, Parodie und Satire in der Literatur des Mittelalters, Deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters, 5, Greifswald, 1989 : p. 44 - 54
>STEVEN BRIAN DAVIS, The mediating vision. Patronage and literary tradition in Guillaume de Machaut and Chaucer's Book of the Duchess, 1991
>LESLIE LINAM DUNTON-DOWNER, The obscene poetic self in Rutebeuf and Chaucer, 1992
>Charles Dahlberg, The literature of unlikeness, Hanover Leiden, UP of New England, 1988
>Hélène Dauby, Chaucer, un anti-Hélinand ?, Hélinand de Froidmont. Colloque et exposition, mai-juin 1987, Les Cahiers de l'Abbaye de Saint-Arnoult, 2, Warluis, ADAMA, 1987 : p. 99 - 110
>JOHN FINLAYSON, Chaucer's Prioress and Amor vincit omnia, Studia Neophilologica, 60, 1988 : p. 171-174
>JOHN FINLAYSON, The «Roman de la rose» and Chaucer's narrators, The Chaucer Review, 24, 1989/90 : p. 187-210
>GILES Y GAMBLE, Troilus Philocaptus. A Case Study in Amor Hereos, Studia Neophilologica, 60, 1988 : p. 175-178
>MICHAEL G HANLY, Boccaccio, Beauvau, Chaucer. «Troilus and Criseyde», four perspectives on influence, Norman, Pilgrim Books, 1990
>CAROL F HEFFERNAN, Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde: the Disease of Love and Courtly Love, Neophilologus, 74/2, 1990 : p. 294-309
>KATHERINE HEINRICHS, Love and Hell: The Denizens of Hades in the Love Poems of the Middle Ages, Neophilologus, 73/4, 1989 : p. 593-604
>KATHERINE HEINRICHS, Troilus' Predestination Soliloquy and Machaut's Jugement du Roy de Behaigne, Le Moyen français, 35-36, 1996 : p. 7-15
>AM JANSEN et AA MAC DONALD, Dating The Remedy of Love: The Limitations of Lexicography, Neophilologus, 75/4, 1991 : p. 619-625
>Madeleine Jeay, Donner la parole. L'histoire-cadre dans les recueils de nouvelles des XV'-XVI' siècles, 1992
>MELODY J KEMP, Palamon and Theban Restoration in the Knight's Tale, Neophilologus, 76/2, 1992 : p. 317-319
>LEONARD M KOFF, Chaucer and the Art of Storytelling, BerkeleyLos AngelesLondon University of California Press X298 p., Keiser, 1988
>Judith Laird, Good women and bonnes dames: virtuous females in Chaucer and Christine de Pizan, Chaucer Review, 30/1, 1995 : p. 58-70
>KATHRYN LILLIAN MAC KINLEY, Ovidian narrative technique in Jean de Meung and Chaucer, 1991
>PIERRE MARECHAUX, Le poème et ses marges. Herméneutique, rhétorique et didactique dans les commentaires des Métamorphoses d'Ovide de la fin du Moyen Age à l'aube de l'époque classique Janvier, 1992
>ALISTAIR J MINNIS, Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages, Philadelphia, Univ. of Philadelphia Press, 1987
>JEROME MITCHELL, Scott, Chaucer and Medieval Romance. A Study in Sir Walter Scott's Indebtedness to the Literature of the Middle Ages, Lexington Kentucky, The University Press of Kentucky, 1987
>Alastair Minnis, A Note on Chaucer and the Ovide Moralisé, Medium Aevum, 48, 1979 : p. 254-257
>MARIJANE OSBORN, The Squire's Steed of Brass' as Astrolabe: Some Implications for The Canterbury Tales, Hermeneutics and Medieval Culture, edited by GALLACHER (Patrick J.) and DAMICO (Helen), New York, State University of New York Press, 1989 : p. -
>LEE PATTERSON, Feminine rhetoric and the politics of subjectivity. La Vieille and the Wife of Bath, Rethinking the «Romance of the Rose». Text, image, reception, Middle Ages Series, Philadelphia, Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1992 : p. 316 - 358
>RA PECK, Chaucer's Romaunt of the Rose and Boece, The Treatiseon the Astrolabe and the Equatorie of the Planetis, and the Lost Works and the Apocrypha. An Annotated Bibliography 1900-1984, 1987
>MARC M PELEN, Murder and immortality in fragment VI (C) of the «Canterbury tales». Chaucer's transformation of theme and image from the «Roman de la Rose», The Chaucer Review, 29, 1994/95 : p. 1-25
>MARC M PELEN, Idleness and alchemy in fragment VIII (G) of Chaucer's «Canterbury Tales». Oppositions in themes and images from the «Roman de la rose», Forum for Modern Languages Studies, 31, 1995 : p. 193-214
>FJJ PETERS, Chaucer's Time in the Nun's Priest's Tale, Studia Neophilologica, 60, 1988 : p. 167-170
>Helen Phillips, Geoffrey Chaucer, The Book of the Duchess, 1982
>Helen Phillips, Chaucer and Deguileville. The «ABC» in context, Medium Aevum, 62, 1993 : p. 1-19
>Helen Phillips, Chaucer and Le Fèvre de Ressons, Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 232, 1995 : p. 23-36
>BRIAN ABEL RAGEN, Chaucer, Jean de Meun, and Proverb 30:20, Notes and Queries, 35, 1988 : p. 295-296
>FLORENCE H RIDLEY, Chaucer and the Hermeneutics, Hermeneutics and Medieval Culture, edited by GALLACHER (Patrick J.) and DAMICO (Helen), New York, State University of New York Press, 1989 : p. -
>JERRY ROOT, «Space to Speke». Confessional practice and the construction of character in the works of Geoffrey Chaucer, Guillaume de Machaut, and Juan Ruiz, 1990
>SALWA WILLIAM SHAFIK-GHALY, Towards a medieval narratology. Discourse and narration in Chrétien'sYvain and Chaucer's Troilus.1988, 1988-89
>ELIZABETH S SKLAR, Guido, The Middle English Troy Books, and Chaucer: The English Connection, Neophilologus, 76/4, 1992 : p. 616-628
>AC SPEARING, Readings in Medieval Poetry, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1987
>PAUL R THOMAS, Cato on Chauntecler: Chaucer's sophisticated Audience, Neophilologus, LXXII, 1988 : p. 278-283
>DAVID J WALLACE, Geoffrey of Vinsauf, Geoffrey Chaucer and Boccaccio's Rakel Hond, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 88/1, 1987 : p. 27-30
>JULIAN N WASSERMAN, Both Fixed and Free: Language and Destiny in Chaucer's Knight's Taleand Troilus and Criseyde, Sign, Sentence, Discourse: Language in Medieval Thought and Literature, Syracuse New York, Syracuse University Press, 1989
>CHAUNCEY WOOD, The Author's Address to the Reader: Chaucer, Juan Ruiz, and Dante, Hermeneutics and Medieval Culture, edited by GALLACHER (Patrick J.) and DAMICO (Helen), New York, State University of New York Press, 1989 : p. -
>Winthrop Wetherbee, Chaucer and the Poets: An Essay on Troilus and Criseyde, 1984
>James I Wimsatt, Chaucer and his french contemporaries. Natural music in the fourteenth century, Medieval Academic Books, Toronto, Univ. of Toronto Press, 1991
>James I Wimsatt, Type conceptions of the good knight in the French Arthurian cycles, Malory and Chaucer, Heroes and Heroines in Medieval English Literature. A Festschrift Presented to André Crépin on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, Cambridge, D.S. Brewer, 1994 : p. 137 - 148
>H - J ZIEGELER, Boccaccio, Chaucer, Mären, Novellen: The Tale of the Cradle, Kleinere Erzählformen im Mittelalter, München/Wien/Zürich, Schöningh, 1988 : p. 9 - 31